Meta Removes "Train" From Commercial Terms Taking Effect Oct. 30 After Scraping Backlash

3.0 · 11d ago · WORLD · AI

The Facts

  • Meta removed the word "train" from its commercial terms of service, which take effect on October 30. Ars Technica only
  • The original terms let Meta use "any content" from websites posted on business pages to "provide, develop, improve, research, train, and maintain the integrity" of Meta products, services, or features. Ars Technica only
  • The revised terms no longer say "any content" and allow Meta to "periodically pull updates" from business users' websites to "provide, develop, improve, research, and maintain advertising and business products" and to maintain integrity and security. Ars Technica only
  • A Meta spokesperson said the crawling terms only applied to ads and business products, do not change how Meta uses web crawlers, and do not supersede content owners' robots.txt preferences. Ars Technica only
  • A Meta spokesperson confirmed Meta did not alert users to the changed language. Ars Technica only
Dive deeper · 3 more factsShow less
  • Legal experts told Nieman Lab the revisions do not go far enough; attorney Matt Topic said "business product" is undefined and "develop" may be broad enough to include "train"; Cornell's James Grimmelmann said the language is still very broad. Ars Technica only
  • The European Publishers Council asked the European Commission to intervene, and the UK News Media Association's Theo Bamber urged UK regulators to prevent the terms from taking effect. Ars Technica only
  • News/Media Alliance CEO Danielle Coffey called the terms "outrageous and probably illegal." Ars Technica only

Context

Meta revised commercial terms of service scheduled to take effect October 30 after legal experts warned they could let the company scrape websites linked on business pages for AI training. The revision deletes "train" and "any content" and adds language on permitted uses.

Meta says the terms apply only to ads and business products. Outside legal experts say the remaining wording is still broad, and news publisher groups in the UK, EU and US have called on regulators to act or criticized the terms.

How the Agent Panel Scored This

Independent AI personas each scored importance 1–10; the story's score is a trimmed mean (highest and lowest votes dropped). Vote spread: 0.

3 News Editor This is a narrow policy wording change by Meta with reactions and criticism from publishers and experts, and no new concrete regulatory or enforcement action, affecting a limited set of business page users.
3 Global Affairs Analyst This is a corporate terms-of-service wording change with limited concrete impact, and most of the story consists of criticism, calls for regulators to act, and reactions rather than a new regulatory or legal action.
3 Science & Tech Analyst This is a minor corporate terms-of-service wording change with limited concrete impact, while most of the story consists of criticism, calls for regulators to act, and rhetoric rather than a new regulatory or legal action.
3 Policy Expert The concrete event is Meta revising its commercial terms wording, a narrow contractual change, while the regulator requests and criticisms are rhetoric without new government action, so impact is limited despite some industry attention.
3 Critical Reader Meta's wording change to commercial terms is a concrete but narrow edit affecting business page users, and the remaining substance is contested criticism and calls for regulators to act rather than an enacted regulatory or legal outcome.
3 Informed Citizen This is a narrow wording change to Meta's business terms, with the substantive concrete action limited to removing one word, while most of the story is criticism and calls for regulators to act, so its real-world impact on ordinary people is limited.
3 Business Analyst This is a minor corporate terms-of-service revision with limited direct economic impact, and most of the story reports reactions and criticism rather than a new concrete regulatory action.

Source

← All stories