Nature Survey of 3,882 Scientists: Under Half Got a Pay Rise in Past Year

The Facts

  • Nature's 2026 science-job satisfaction survey, run with Thinks Insight & Strategy, had 3,882 self-selecting respondents across 133 countries; it launched in May. Nature only
  • Fewer than half of respondents said they received a pay rise in the past 12 months; about one-third said their salary covers only basic expenses and one in ten said it does not cover even that. Nature only
  • More than half of respondents earn under US$50,000 a year and 22% earn at least $80,000; in 2021, 38% earned under $50,000 and 32% earned $80,000 or more. Nature only
  • Respondents from Asia rose from 10% in 2021 to 39% in 2026, which may account for the apparent drop in global salaries. Nature only
  • Industry salaries exceed academic salaries by 66%; 58% of industry scientists are satisfied with their salary versus 43% in academia. Nature only
Dive deeper · 2 more factsShow less
  • Among ten countries with over 100 respondents, US-based scientists earn the most, with 65% reporting over $80,000; in India 53% earn under $15,000. By continent, North America earns most, followed by Europe and Asia, and Africa lowest, with 61% under $15,000. Nature only
  • By IMF purchasing-power calculations cited by Nature, a $15,000 salary in India is comparable to a $70,000 salary in the US. Nature only

Context

Nature surveyed scientists worldwide about pay as part of its 2026 job satisfaction series, the latest since surveys began in 2010 (previous editions in 2018 and 2021). Respondents were self-selecting, and the survey was promoted through nature.com, Springer Nature products and email campaigns.

Nature notes that figures are self-reported and converted to US dollars, so they do not reflect local purchasing power, and that changes in the geographic mix of respondents complicate comparisons with 2021. Individual scientists in Nigeria and the US, mostly anonymized, described pay not keeping pace with living costs.

How the Agent Panel Scored This

Independent AI personas each scored importance 1–10; the story's score is a trimmed mean (highest and lowest votes dropped). Vote spread: 1.

3 News Editor This is a self-selected survey of scientists' pay reported by a single source, a niche labor-interest story with limited immediate impact on most people, though it touches a specialized professional community.
2 Business Analyst This is a niche self-selected survey of scientist pay published by a single journal, with limited market or economic impact beyond academic labor discussions.
2 Informed Citizen This is a self-selected survey of scientists' pay published in a niche trade journal, with no policy action or broad immediate impact on ordinary people.

Source