Judge Defers Ruling on DOJ Bid to Set Aside 20,000 California Ballots; Essayli Disqualified

6.4 · 5d ago · US

The Facts

  • On Monday, the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, by a 2-1 vote, denied the Trump administration's request to immediately order California to set aside about 20,000 mail-in ballots. ✓4 · CBS News, NY Times, Al Jazeera, NBC News
  • The majority of the 9th Circuit said the Justice Department had not given the lower court a chance to review its claims before seeking appellate relief. ✓2 · NBC News, Al Jazeera
  • On Tuesday, a federal judge in the DOJ-California case deferred a ruling and said the government already had a remedy it could use after the election. NY Times only
  • U.S. District Judge David O. Carter said he would rule Wednesday on the DOJ's request to have ballots tied to about 20,000 suspected noncitizens separated while eligibility is reviewed. Fox News only
  • U.S. District Judge J. Michael Seabright ruled Tuesday that Bill Essayli, First Assistant U.S. Attorney in the Central District of California, is unlawfully serving as a 'de facto' U.S. attorney, and barred him from participating in or supervising two criminal cases. Fox News only
Dive deeper · 11 more factsShow less
  • The disqualification does not take effect immediately, giving the Justice Department time to seek a stay pending appeal. Essayli said he disagrees and expects the Supreme Court to decide the question. Fox News only
  • Essayli's interim U.S. attorney appointment expired after 120 days; he was then named special attorney and first assistant by then-Attorney General Pam Bondi. He was never nominated by the president or confirmed by the Senate. Fox News only
  • Attorney General Todd Blanche issued a revised designation last month narrowing Essayli's authority, which Seabright found still left him effectively occupying the vacant post. Seabright revisited the issue after the Ninth Circuit ruled against a similar arrangement in Nevada. Fox News only
  • Judge Gabriel Sanchez wrote that the request asked a federal court to dictate to a state a matter within its traditional domain, and that granting it would invite 'disorder and confusion for voters and election officials alike'. Al Jazeera only
  • The DOJ asserts the ballots went to likely noncitizens; Al Jazeera reports it has not publicly disclosed how it compiled the list. Al Jazeera only
  • The DOJ sued California on October 15. The midterm election is November 3. Al Jazeera only
  • Los Angeles County election officials said in a legal filing that the DOJ list appeared to come from old voting lists and included many apparent U.S. citizens whose registrations listed U.S. birthplaces. NBC News only
  • On Monday, acting U.S. Attorney Neil Floyd asked Washington's secretary of state to review a list of more than 400 registrants the DOJ believes are noncitizens and to sequester any ballots they cast, giving the state 24 hours. Secretary of State Steve Hobbs' office is reviewing the list; Hobbs said the state will respond only to requests following due process. NBC News only
  • Last week the DOJ sued Alaska over a Senate candidate sharing the name of Republican incumbent Dan Sullivan, asking the court to block certification unless the senator wins. NBC News only
  • The DOJ has sued 30 states and Washington, DC, for voter-roll access and has lost 26 cases, winning none so far. Al Jazeera only
  • Attorney General Todd Blanche said on 'Face the Nation' that the DOJ is not laying groundwork to overturn unfavorable election results. CBS News only

Context

A federal district court heard the Justice Department's request in its suit against California to set aside ballots tied to about 20,000 registrants it says are likely noncitizens. The NY Times reports the judge deferred a ruling and said the government has a remedy available after the election; Fox News reports Judge David Carter said he would rule Wednesday. This follows the 9th Circuit's 2-1 denial of emergency relief on Monday.

Separately, Judge J. Michael Seabright found Bill Essayli, who is helping lead the DOJ effort, is unlawfully serving as a de facto U.S. attorney and disqualified him from two criminal cases, effective after time for a stay request. The midterm election is November 3.

Conflicting Reports

  • NY Times says the judge 'deferred a ruling'; Fox News says Judge Carter would issue a ruling Wednesday. These may be compatible, as the deferral may refer to the Wednesday timing.

How the Agent Panel Scored This

Independent AI personas each scored importance 1–10; the story's score is a trimmed mean (highest and lowest votes dropped). Vote spread: 1.

7 News Editor The story reports concrete court actions with real stakes, including a federal ruling disqualifying a U.S. attorney from two criminal cases and a deferred ruling on setting aside about 20,000 ballots ahead of the November midterms, affecting many voters and prosecutions.
7 Policy Expert The story reports concrete legal actions with significant impact, including a court ruling disqualifying Essayli from two criminal cases, an appellate denial of emergency relief to set aside 20,000 ballots, and DOJ demands on Washington state, affecting a major federal election and federal prosecutorial authority.
7 Global Affairs Analyst The story reports concrete court actions with significant stakes, including a judicial ruling that Essayli is unlawfully serving and barred from two cases, plus a deferred DOJ bid to set aside about 20,000 California ballots ahead of the November midterms, though some items are procedural or rhetorical.
6 Science & Tech Analyst The story reports concrete court actions—a 9th Circuit denial, a judge's deferral, and a ruling disqualifying a U.S. attorney from two criminal cases—bearing on a major midterm election dispute, but the direct impact is moderate and the disqualification is stayed pending appeal.
6 Business Analyst The story reports concrete legal actions with real stakes: a court ruling disqualifying a top federal prosecutor from two criminal cases and pending decisions on setting aside about 20,000 ballots ahead of the midterms, though much of the content is procedural deferrals and rhetoric rather than final, market-moving outcomes.
6 Critical Reader The story reports concrete court actions (a 9th Circuit denial, a judge's ruling that Essayli is unlawfully serving and barred from two cases, and a deferred ballot-set-aside ruling), but the disqualification is not yet in effect and the ballot request was not granted, so the measurable impact is moderate and still pending.
6 Informed Citizen The story reports concrete court actions (a 9th Circuit denial, a judge's disqualification of Essayli, a deferred ballot ruling) tied to the 2026 midterms and a DOJ voter-roll fight, which matters to many voters and officials, though the immediate effects on ordinary people are limited and the disqualification is stayed.

Sources (9)

← All stories