Hennepin County Charges James O'Keefe, Cam Higby With Unlawful Voting, Identity Theft

4.0 · 1d ago · US

The Facts

  • Hennepin County, Minnesota prosecutors charged James O'Keefe (42) and Cam Higby (26) with felony unlawful voting and identity theft on Wednesday. ✓3 · NBC News, CBS News, BBC
  • The charges stem from videos filmed during Minnesota's Aug. 11 primary, in which the pair gave election judges the names of registered voters in the precinct without those voters' knowledge or permission. ✓3 · NBC News, CBS News, BBC
  • The pair appeared in Islamic attire and used fake accents while using Minnesota's vouching law, which lets a registered voter vouch for up to eight people. ✓3 · NBC News, CBS News, BBC
  • Secretary of State Steve Simon said attempts to disrupt or deceive election workers will not be tolerated. ✓3 · CBS News, BBC, NBC News
  • Neither man signed the oath required before receiving a ballot; prosecutors say Minnesota law bars intentionally misrepresenting identity when applying for a ballot. ✓2 · NBC News, BBC
Dive deeper · 5 more factsShow less
  • The Hennepin County Attorney's Office says the men posted the videos to try to undermine confidence in Minnesota's voting systems. ✓2 · CBS News, BBC
  • County Attorney Mary Moriarty said her office was alerted by the Secretary of State Steve Simon's office, and that the pair also used names of deceased voters; she said it is unknown where they got the names. NBC News only
  • The men are not in jail and will receive a summons to appear in court in Minnesota, according to Moriarty. NBC News only
  • In the video, O'Keefe identified himself as William Pomeranz, a real voter, who said he learned of it days later and was able to vote that evening. CBS News only
  • Higby told the BBC he never voted, never signed an affidavit and never violated a law, and said the aim was to expose vulnerabilities in the voting system. BBC only

Context

Hennepin County prosecutors charged conservative activists James O'Keefe and Cam Higby after videos from Minnesota's Aug. 11 primary showed them giving poll workers the names of real registered voters while using the state's vouching process. Prosecutors say neither completed the oath or cast a ballot, but that misrepresenting identity when applying for a ballot is itself prohibited.

O'Keefe founded Project Veritas and was removed as its head in 2023; he now runs O'Keefe Media Group. Higby, a former journalist for conservative outlets, runs a YouTube channel. Neither had responded to NBC News' requests for comment; Higby disputed wrongdoing to the BBC.

Conflicting Reports

  • NBC News quotes Moriarty saying the pair also used names of deceased voters; CBS News and BBC do not report this.
  • CBS News and BBC say it was not stated when the men are due in court; NBC News reports Moriarty said they will be issued a summons to appear.

How the Agent Panel Scored This

Independent AI personas each scored importance 1–10; the story's score is a trimmed mean (highest and lowest votes dropped). Vote spread: 2.

5 Policy Expert Criminal charges filed by a county prosecutor against two individuals for election-related fraud is a concrete governmental action with moderate, localized importance, though it affects only the two defendants and draws attention to voting-system vulnerabilities.
4 Science & Tech Analyst Criminal charges against two activists for a stunt during a state primary are a concrete action with notable local and election-integrity interest, but the impact is limited to a small number of defendants and no votes were confirmed cast.
4 News Editor A concrete criminal charge against two activists in a single county is newsworthy and touches election integrity, but its impact is limited to the defendants and local election procedure rather than many people broadly.
4 Global Affairs Analyst Criminal charges against two activists for a staged voter-fraud sting in a single county is a concrete legal action with limited national impact, though it touches election integrity concerns.
4 Business Analyst Criminal charges against two activists for a stunt during a state primary are a concrete legal action with limited broader economic or population-wide impact, so it is minor news rather than market-relevant.
4 Critical Reader Criminal charges against two activists for a stunt during a state primary is a concrete legal action with limited broad impact, though it touches election integrity and has some public interest.
3 Informed Citizen This is a concrete criminal charge against two activists over a single primary election stunt, with limited impact on ordinary voters beyond local election-integrity interest.

Sources (3)

← All stories