Civil servant on trial for fraud says he 'made mistakes' juggling five public-sector jobs

3.0 · 10d ago · WORLD

The Facts

  • Kashim Chowdhury, 55, from east London, is on trial at Southwark Crown Court accused of nine counts of fraud; he denies acting dishonestly or intending a dishonest gain. BBC only
  • Prosecutors allege he fraudulently earned more than £284,000 by juggling multiple public-sector jobs. BBC only
  • Prosecutors allege that at the height of the alleged deceit he held five full-time public-sector jobs; in spring 2023 these were at Defra, the UK Health Security Agency, the Food Standards Agency, the Department for Business and Trade and the Home Office. BBC only
  • The jury was told he was contracted to work 183 hours a week across the roles, and he was paid £11,000 for a single month's work in 2023. BBC only
  • Giving evidence, Chowdhury said he made mistakes because he was 'overwhelmed and stressed', said 'I do not believe there was criminal intent', and said he was diagnosed with PTSD in 2015, triggered in 2021. BBC only
Dive deeper · 4 more factsShow less
  • Chowdhury told the jury that managers at Defra, Tower Hamlets council, East London NHS Trust and the DHSC knew he had other jobs. BBC only
  • Prosecutors allege he kept the jobs secret by working entirely remotely, told employers he was sole carer for his elderly mother, and used sick notes citing 'mixed anxiety and depressive disorder' with some employers but not others. BBC only
  • Line managers told the jury he performed poorly; Abigail Mounde of the Department for Business and Trade said basic tasks were done late or below standard. BBC only
  • Aleesha Adams, his UK Health Security Agency manager, told the court that on a May 2023 video call he wore white make-up that began coming off his forehead. BBC only

Context

Kashim Chowdhury is on trial at Southwark Crown Court over allegations that he held multiple full-time public-sector jobs at once without disclosing them to employers. He has given evidence, admitting mistakes but denying criminal intent.

The prosecution case rests on claims of concealment through remote working, caring-responsibility claims and selective sick notes. The trial continues.

How the Agent Panel Scored This

Independent AI personas each scored importance 1–10; the story's score is a trimmed mean (highest and lowest votes dropped). Vote spread: 0.

3 News Editor This is a local court trial report about one individual's alleged fraud, with ongoing testimony and no verdict, so it has limited impact beyond public-sector oversight interest.
3 Informed Citizen This is a court trial report of testimony in an individual fraud case with no new concrete action affecting the public beyond ongoing proceedings, so impact is limited to the parties involved and the story is of modest public interest.
3 Business Analyst This story reports ongoing trial testimony and allegations about one individual's alleged fraud, a niche criminal case with limited economic impact beyond public-sector payroll concerns, not a new concrete policy or market-moving action.

Source

← All stories