WNBA Finalists Dream, Valkyries Off Court for Anthem in First 3 Games Despite Rulebook

The Facts

  • Atlanta Dream and Golden State Valkyries players left the court shortly before the national anthem and returned seconds after it ended before each of the first three WNBA Finals games. Fox News only
  • The WNBA's 2026 official rulebook calls for players, coaches and trainers to stand and line up along the sidelines or foul line during the national anthem. Fox News only
  • Valkyries coach Natalie Nakase called the absences part of the team's pregame routine, saying 'We're two years in. That's been part of our pregame.' Asked who decided on it, she said 'I really don't know.' Fox News only
  • Valkyries forward Gabby Williams, asked why the team is off the court, said 'That's been the routine for like, seven years now.' A team PR representative then moved to the next question; Williams was asked whether it was a protest and denied it was a demonstration, per OutKick. Fox News only
  • Dream guard Rhyne Howard said she doesn't think she has been on the floor for the anthem during her tenure in Atlanta, but that she stands for it when playing for Team USA. Fox News only
Dive deeper · 3 more factsShow less
  • OutKick said the NBA (via communications chief Mike Bass), the WNBA and both teams did not respond to its questions about the absences, possible discipline and plans for Game 3. Fox News only
  • During the 2017 Finals, Los Angeles Sparks players voted to remain in the locker room during the anthem in solidarity with Black Lives Matter, according to ESPN reporting at the time as cited by OutKick. Fox News only
  • Fox News headline states Vice President JD Vance condemned the WNBA anthem walkouts as 'disgraceful'; no details given in the supplied text. Fox News only

Context

Both WNBA Finals teams, the Atlanta Dream and Golden State Valkyries, have been off the court for the national anthem before the first three games, despite a rulebook provision calling for players to line up. All reporting comes from Fox News's OutKick, which says it received no responses from the league offices or teams before Game 4.

Coaches and players interviewed described the practice as routine and did not explain who established it or why it occurs during the anthem.

How the Agent Panel Scored This

Independent AI personas each scored importance 1–10; the story's score is a trimmed mean (highest and lowest votes dropped). Vote spread: 1.

4 News Editor A WNBA Finals pregame practice drawing rulebook-violation questions and a Vance rebuke is a concrete but niche sports-policy story with limited broad impact, mostly reactions and unanswered questions rather than a new league action.
3 Business Analyst This is a niche sports-protocol story about players leaving the court during the anthem, with no market-moving economic impact, though it carries some minor league-policy and political controversy.
3 Policy Expert The story reports a recurring pregame practice of players leaving the court during the anthem, contrary to the rulebook, with no league or team action, discipline, or official decision reported; only rhetoric from a VP and unexplained comments make it a minor, limited-impact news item.
3 Critical Reader The story reports a recurring pregame practice of players leaving the court during the anthem in violation of a rulebook, but the concrete events are limited to absences and non-responses, with the Vance 'disgraceful' remark being rhetoric without new action, so impact is limited and niche.
3 Science & Tech Analyst This is a niche sports-protocol controversy involving players leaving the court during the anthem, with the concrete event limited to repeated absences and no league action yet, though it has some political attention via Vance's rhetoric which itself scores low.
3 Global Affairs Analyst The story reports a recurring pregame practice of teams leaving the court during the anthem in apparent violation of a rulebook, with no league response, discipline, or new concrete action, and the main political reaction (Vance's remark) is rhetoric without details, making this a minor sports-policy story with limited impact.
3 Informed Citizen This is a niche sports-protocol controversy involving players leaving the court during the anthem, with no new concrete league action or discipline yet, mainly reactions and unanswered questions, so its impact on ordinary people is limited.

Sources (4)