Cuba Says US Threatens Countries Over Vote on UN Resolution Against Embargo

The Facts

  • Cuban Foreign Minister Bruno Rodriguez said on Wednesday that the Trump administration is pressuring UN General Assembly members to vote against the annual resolution calling for an end to the US embargo on Cuba. Al Jazeera only
  • Rodriguez alleged US officials threatened tariffs, visa denials for officials and their families, suspension of cooperation programmes, and backing for opposition parties in elections; he said Secretary of State Marco Rubio and UN Ambassador Mike Waltz were leading the campaign. Al Jazeera only
  • Rodriguez also accused the US of urging some countries to abstain or skip the vote. Al Jazeera only
  • The General Assembly vote on the nonbinding resolution is expected on October 27 or 28. Al Jazeera only
  • Waltz acknowledged on Monday that the US has asked European countries to reconsider their support for the resolution, citing Ukrainian allegations that Cuban nationals fighting for Russia are not being paid and that the money goes to the Cuban government. Al Jazeera only
Dive deeper · 3 more factsShow less
  • The US State Department and US Mission to the UN had not replied to Al Jazeera's request for comment by publication. Al Jazeera only
  • The General Assembly has voted overwhelmingly for such resolutions almost every year since 1992. Al Jazeera only
  • Since the start of 2026, the Trump administration has blocked oil supplies to Cuba and threatened tariffs on countries supplying it with fuel, with Cubans facing shortages and prolonged blackouts. Al Jazeera only

Context

Cuba says the US is pressuring countries to change their votes on the annual UN General Assembly resolution against the US embargo, which dates to the early 1960s. The US has not responded to the specific allegations, though Ambassador Mike Waltz confirmed lobbying European countries to reconsider their support.

The Trump administration maintains that the Cuban government, not the embargo, is responsible for the island's economic difficulties.

How the Agent Panel Scored This

Independent AI personas each scored importance 1–10; the story's score is a trimmed mean (highest and lowest votes dropped). Vote spread: 1.

3 Business Analyst The story reports mainly Cuban allegations and rhetoric about US lobbying ahead of a nonbinding UN vote, with only Waltz's acknowledgment of lobbying European countries as a concrete action, giving it limited economic impact.
3 News Editor The story centers on Cuban accusations and statements about US lobbying over a nonbinding UN vote, with only Waltz's acknowledged lobbying of European countries as a concrete-ish action, so it is minor news with limited immediate impact.
3 Critical Reader The story centers on Cuba's allegations and rhetoric about US lobbying over a nonbinding UN vote, with only Waltz's acknowledged lobbying as a concrete action, so its impact is limited despite the broader Cuba-US tensions.
3 Global Affairs Analyst The story centers on Cuban allegations and official comments about US lobbying over a nonbinding UN vote, with the only concrete US action being Waltz's acknowledged request to European countries to reconsider, so it is mostly rhetoric with limited direct impact.
3 Policy Expert The story centers on Cuban official allegations and a US ambassador's acknowledgment of lobbying, which are largely rhetoric and diplomatic pressure without a new enacted action, though the underlying oil blockade and tariff threats add some concrete policy context.
3 Science & Tech Analyst The story centers on Cuba's allegations and diplomatic lobbying ahead of a nonbinding UN vote, with the only concrete US action (Waltz confirming outreach to European countries) being a minor diplomatic step with limited direct impact.
2 Informed Citizen This story mainly reports Cuban official accusations and rhetoric about US lobbying on a nonbinding UN vote, with only a confirmed lobbying effort and no concrete new policy action affecting ordinary people.

Source