DOJ Asks Supreme Court to Lift Injunction Blocking Big Bend Border Wall Construction

4.6 · 10d ago · US

The Facts

  • The Trump administration asked the Supreme Court on Wednesday to allow construction of a border wall and related infrastructure in the Big Bend region of West Texas to resume while litigation continues. ✓2 · CBS News, NY Times
  • A lower court judge had halted the administration's plan to build hundreds of miles of barriers in the Big Bend region. ✓2 · NY Times, CBS News
  • U.S. District Judge Kathleen Cardone granted a preliminary injunction earlier this month barring DHS from building border barriers or related infrastructure, or conducting 'any construction or ground disturbing activities,' in the Big Bend Sector. CBS News only
  • Cardone found that Kristi Noem and Markwayne Mullin exceeded their authority in issuing waivers between February and July that allowed construction to proceed. She rejected the administration's request to pause her ruling just before the Supreme Court filing. CBS News only
  • Solicitor General D. John Sauer wrote that the injunction 'significantly frustrates the government's ability to stop the flow of illegal aliens and drugs across the southern border.' CBS News only
Dive deeper · 6 more factsShow less
  • The Big Bend Sector covers more than 500 miles of the U.S.-Mexico border and 77 counties in Texas. The government says the project would include 30-foot bollard walls from Fort Quitman to Closed Canyon, with walls and roads spanning more than 300 miles. CBS News only
  • CBP says construction of a 47-mile stretch of wall in the region began last month. The Justice Department said contracts have been awarded for five border-barrier projects in the area. CBS News only
  • CBP Commissioner Rodney Scott paused construction inside Big Bend National Park until the end of September after backlash from lawmakers of both parties, ranchers and Texas law enforcement. CBP says the wall will not cut through the park, but patrol roads, detection technology and about 17 miles of vehicle barriers would. CBS News only
  • Then-DHS Secretary Kristi Noem invoked a 1996 immigration law authority to waive legal requirements, including environmental and historic preservation laws. Her successor Markwayne Mullin issued two more waivers. CBS News only
  • An environmental nonprofit, a riverboat guide and a religious organization sued in April to stop the project. CBS News only
  • The government says more than 89,000 people were apprehended in the Big Bend Sector between 2021 and 2025. Plaintiffs say the sector ranks last among the seven southern border sectors, with annual apprehensions between 0.3% and 2.2% of the border-wide total, according to court filings. CBS News only

Context

The Justice Department filed an emergency request with the Supreme Court seeking to lift a preliminary injunction that bars DHS from building border barriers and infrastructure in the Big Bend Sector of Texas. The injunction was issued by U.S. District Judge Kathleen Cardone, who found earlier DHS waivers exceeded the secretary's authority.

The administration argues the area qualifies as one of high illegal entry, while the plaintiffs point to the sector's low share of border-wide apprehensions. The project drew bipartisan criticism earlier this year after images of bulldozers at Big Bend National Park circulated.

Conflicting Reports

  • The government says the Big Bend Sector has high illegal crossing and smuggling rates (more than 89,000 apprehensions from 2021 to 2025); plaintiffs say it ranks last among southern border sectors for apprehensions (CBS News reporting both sides' claims).

How the Agent Panel Scored This

Independent AI personas each scored importance 1–10; the story's score is a trimmed mean (highest and lowest votes dropped). Vote spread: 2.

6 Policy Expert The story reports a concrete legal action, an emergency Supreme Court filing seeking to lift an injunction that halts construction of hundreds of miles of border barriers affecting a large, politically significant region, but the filing itself is a request rather than a ruling or enacted policy change.
5 Business Analyst A concrete emergency legal filing seeking to lift an injunction on a multi-hundred-mile border wall project is newsworthy with regional impact and legal significance, but it is a litigation step rather than a final ruling or major market-moving event.
5 News Editor The story reports a concrete new legal action, an emergency Supreme Court filing to lift an injunction on a regional border wall project affecting a large area of Texas, but its direct impact is regional and the outcome remains pending, placing it in the moderate-importance range.
5 Global Affairs Analyst The story reports a concrete legal action, an emergency Supreme Court filing seeking to lift an injunction on hundreds of miles of border wall construction, which is a notable domestic policy and legal fight with regional impact but not a major breaking geopolitical shift.
4 Science & Tech Analyst The story reports a new concrete legal action, an emergency Supreme Court filing, over a regional border wall project affecting one sector and a national park debate, which is newsworthy but limited in scope and not yet a decision.
4 Informed Citizen The story reports a legal filing requesting Supreme Court relief, a procedural step rather than a concrete change, though the underlying Big Bend border wall construction affects a regional area and could shift in coming weeks depending on the Court's decision.
4 Critical Reader This is a filing requesting Supreme Court relief, not a ruling, but it concerns a concrete, locally significant border construction project with an active injunction affecting a 500-mile sector and ongoing construction, making it more than routine yet still pending and limited in national immediate impact.

Sources (2)

← All stories