Oura Sues Ultrahuman Over Ring Pro Patents, Seeks U.S. Sales Ban

3.7 · 9d ago · US · TECH

The Facts

  • Oura filed a patent infringement complaint on Thursday in a federal court in Texas against Ultrahuman, alleging its Ring Pro infringes two Oura patents (D804,471 and 12,769,363) covering design and internal components including battery and sensors. TechCrunch only
  • Oura seeks monetary damages and a permanent injunction to stop Ultrahuman from selling the Ring Pro. TechCrunch only
  • Patent 12,769,363 was issued to Oura on October 20, two days before the suit was filed. TechCrunch only
  • Texas-based manufacturer SVTronics is named as a defendant; the complaint alleges it makes the Ring Pro in Plano, Texas, under Ultrahuman's direction and control. TechCrunch only
  • Ultrahuman's redesigned Ring Pro launched in February and received a favorable U.S. Customs and Border Protection ruling in March, enabling its return to the U.S. after an import ban on the Ring Air that followed an August 2025 ITC patent ruling for Oura. TechCrunch only
Dive deeper · 4 more factsShow less
  • Oura argues the Customs ruling covered only the patent from the earlier dispute, not the two patents in the new suit. TechCrunch only
  • Oura has also pursued patent claims against Samsung, RingConn, Circular and Zepp Health; RingConn and Circular agreed to pay royalties to Oura. TechCrunch only
  • Oura shelved a $2.2 billion IPO weeks ago, citing market uncertainty; Ultrahuman raised $70 million in September at a valuation of about $365 million. TechCrunch only
  • Ultrahuman did not respond to a request for comment. TechCrunch only

Context

Oura has filed a new patent lawsuit in Texas federal court targeting Ultrahuman's redesigned Ring Pro, which returned to the U.S. market after an import ban on the earlier Ring Air. Oura says the earlier Customs ruling did not cover the two patents now at issue.

The companies have been in patent disputes since 2023. IDC expects global smart ring shipments to rise 12.8% this year to 4.9 million units.

How the Agent Panel Scored This

Independent AI personas each scored importance 1–10; the story's score is a trimmed mean (highest and lowest votes dropped). Vote spread: 1.

4 Business Analyst A new patent infringement lawsuit seeking a sales injunction against a niche wearable's redesigned product is a concrete legal action with limited market-wide impact, though it touches a notable IPO-stage company and an ongoing dispute.
4 News Editor This is a new concrete legal action (a patent infringement lawsuit seeking a sales ban) between two notable companies in a niche consumer-electronics market, with limited broad public impact.
3 Informed Citizen A new patent lawsuit seeking a sales ban is a concrete legal action with limited direct impact on ordinary consumers, affecting mainly the niche smart ring market and the two companies, and it may not matter much in a week.

Source

← All stories