Brand Trial Hears Complainant Say She Told Him He 'Treated Her Like an Animal'

3.8 · 11d ago · WORLD

The Facts

  • Russell Brand, 51, faces seven charges at trial at Southwark Crown Court in London: three counts of rape, three of sexual assault and one of indecent assault. BBC only
  • The allegations come from six female complainants and span 1999 to 2009. Brand denies all charges and has said he has never engaged in non-consensual sexual activity. BBC only
  • The jury heard recorded police interviews with a female complainant who says she did not consent to anal sex with Brand at his house in 2009. She said she had agreed only to vaginal sex and that no conversation about anal sex took place. BBC only
  • She said she first met Brand at one of his shows at Hammersmith Apollo in 2009, while she had a boyfriend, and performed a sex act on him in his dressing room. BBC only
  • The court heard Brand made her shower and brush her teeth before they had sex. BBC only
Dive deeper · 5 more factsShow less
  • She said about six months later Brand sent her a text saying he wanted to 'push her further'. She said she replied 'I think you've pushed me far enough, you treated me like an animal', and that he immediately replied 'I'm sorry'. BBC only
  • One complainant told police in video evidence shown to the jury that Brand raped her at his Hampstead home in London in 2009, after she met him at the Hammersmith Apollo. She said she went to the house knowing they would have sex, but that a consensual encounter became rape when he ignored her pleas to stop. She said she 'couldn't speak or breathe'. BBC only
  • A second complainant, now in her 50s, testified from behind a screen that Brand grabbed her, kissed her and touched her body at the Choice FM studios in central London in the mid-2000s. She said she believed he was in the building for Big Brother's Big Mouth. BBC only
  • Under cross-examination, the second complainant said she did not report the incident at the time because of the culture then and fears about her job and mortgage. She said she came forward after watching a documentary about Brand. BBC only
  • A third complainant, who worked with Brand on a 2009 Channel 4 project, also gave evidence from behind a screen. She said members of his team asked her for a massage on his behalf. BBC only

Context

The trial of comedian Russell Brand at Southwark Crown Court continues, with jurors hearing recorded police interviews and live testimony from complainants. The latest evidence concerns a woman who alleges she was raped at Brand's home in 2009 and who describes a later exchange of text messages with him. Brand denies all charges.

How the Agent Panel Scored This

Independent AI personas each scored importance 1–10; the story's score is a trimmed mean (highest and lowest votes dropped). Vote spread: 2.

5 News Editor A high-profile criminal trial of a well-known comedian with testimony from multiple complainants is newsworthy and of moderate-to-significant public interest, but it reports courtroom testimony rather than a broad concrete event affecting many people.
4 Informed Citizen This is a court trial reporting testimony from complainants with no new concrete action or verdict, affecting mainly the parties involved, though the high-profile defendant gives it moderate public interest.
4 Critical Reader This is a trial in progress reporting testimony and recorded interviews, with no verdict or new binding action, though the case involves a high-profile defendant and serious charges.
4 Policy Expert This story reports ongoing trial testimony in a high-profile criminal case, which is newsworthy with notable public interest but involves no new verdict, ruling, or enacted action, and its impact is limited to the parties and trial proceedings.
4 Science & Tech Analyst This is testimony in an ongoing criminal trial of a well-known comedian, reporting complainant accounts rather than a new verdict or major consequence, so it has moderate newsworthiness but limited broad impact.
3 Business Analyst This story reports ongoing trial testimony and recorded police interviews in a criminal case against a celebrity, which is newsworthy but has limited economic or broad societal impact beyond the proceedings themselves.
3 Global Affairs Analyst This is a criminal trial's ongoing testimony about a celebrity defendant, a notable story with limited broader geopolitical or widespread impact, so it scores low on the importance scale.

Sources (2)

← All stories