Chicago Offers Ballots in 12 Languages; Only 1.85% of March Primary Ballots Were Multilingual
The Facts
- Chicago voters can cast ballots in 12 languages: English, Spanish, Chinese, Hindi, Korean, Tagalog, Polish, Gujarati, Urdu, Ukrainian, Arabic and Russian. Fox News only
- Section 203 of the Voting Rights Act requires the Chicago Board of Elections to provide materials and ballots in certain precincts for Spanish, Chinese and Hindi speakers, according to a Board spokesperson. Fox News only
- The Board says it includes the other languages to maintain uniformity with the Cook County Clerk's office languages under a county ordinance. Fox News only
- In the March primary, 7,857 multilingual ballots were cast, about 1.85% of 424,564 ballots cast citywide, per Board figures. Fox News only
- March primary usage by language option: Polish 4,474; Chinese 2,183; Hindi 664; Korean 352; Tagalog 100; Russian 25; Ukrainian 25; Urdu 15; Arabic 10; Gujarati 9. Fox News only
Dive deeper · 3 more factsShow less
- Of 7,218 election judges assigned for the November general election as of Thursday, 810 are multilingual, including speakers of Spanish, Chinese, Hindi, Urdu, Gujarati, Polish, Korean and Tagalog, per the Board. Fox News only
- Illinois GOP Chairman Bob Grogan said the many languages make elections harder to monitor and questioned the need for some translations; he said the risk depends on how widely they are used. Fox News only
- The Board says it has in-house translation staff and that voters may bring an interpreter under certain conditions. Fox News only
Context
Chicago offers ballots in 12 languages. The Chicago Board of Elections says federal law requires three of them in certain precincts, and that it provides the rest to match Cook County Clerk practice under a county ordinance.
Illinois Republican Party Chairman Bob Grogan told Fox News Digital that the number of languages makes ballots harder for judges and observers to monitor. Board data shows multilingual ballots were about 1.85% of March primary ballots, with several languages used by fewer than 30 voters.
How the Agent Panel Scored This
Independent AI personas each scored importance 1–10; the story's score is a trimmed mean (highest and lowest votes dropped). Vote spread: 1.
| 3 | News Editor | This is a local report on ballot language availability with low usage figures and largely partisan criticism, with no new concrete government action affecting a broad population. |
| 3 | Informed Citizen | This is a local story about election ballot language options and usage statistics in Chicago, with limited immediate impact beyond a partisan criticism and routine administrative data. |
| 2 | Business Analyst | This is a local, niche story about ballot language options with minimal usage data and mostly partisan criticism, with no new concrete policy action or broad economic impact. |